Web 3.0: The expanding Sea of Data

[click on the title bar]

The Semantic Web provides a common framework that allows data to be shared and reused across applications and community boundaries. It is based on the Resource Description Framework (RDF). Sir Tim Berners-Lee, Internet pioneer, and director of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), discusses the future of the Web.



A characteristic of user engagement with the Semantic Web, noted by Berners-Lee, is the ability to apply different analytical lenses to data sets in order to "mine" that data. Data mining is a term used to uncover patterns in data samples. The challenge is to find cross domain semantic terms and to be able to communicate these both within and across disciplines. EXtensible Markup Language (XML) is now as important for the Web as HTML was to the foundation of the Web. It is the most common tool for data transmissions between all sorts of applications, and is becoming more popular in the area of storing and describing information. With XML, data can be available to all kinds of "reading machines" (Handheld computers, voice machines, news feeds, etc), and make it more available for the visually impaired. RDF is used to describe resources and ontology. Common RDF standards reduce costs for individuals, communities and organisations managing information. Dr K Faith Lawrence, Digital Humanities Observatory, speaking at Cork, noted that data is invested with different intellectual capital between the humanities and the sciences. A scientist may invest intellectual capital in the raw data itself, while, a humanist, may invest intellectual capital in the final analysis of that data. Common RDF standards enable data to be stitched together from mutiple sources enabling a web of data - The Semantic Web.

Comment

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Education versus “learnification” what’s at stake?

Will the effects of pandemic pedagogy accelerate learnification?  Gert Biesta ,  Dutch-born education philosopher  who is associated with the reclaiming teaching movement,  highlights that the discourse of “education” has become disconnected from “learning.” This shift began during the 1980s, accelerated as a consequence of the proliferation of educational technology over the past twenty years, and is likely to increase with data-gathering and extended reality becoming ubiquitous within educational systems. Biesta makes the point that language constructs reality and that the language of learning has privileged process , but has excluded questions of purpose and content and relationships within dynamic human interrelationships that should define teaching and learning (Biesta, 2012). The sole concern of learnification becomes the individualistic process of learning, rather than the purpose , context , and relationships that are central to education as both a humanistic and holistic
Read more

The Teaching Portfolio in Principle and in Practice

"Changing the status of the  problem  in teaching from terminal remediation to ongoing investigation is precisely what the movement for a scholarship of teaching is all about." (Bass, 1999: 1).  A: From "scholarly teaching" to "scholarship of teaching (and learning)" Ernest L. Boyer (1990), advocated that the idea of scholarship in higher education needed to be broadened to include teaching as well as the dimensions of discovery, integration (later changed to engagement), and application. Boyer made a strong case for a “scholarship of teaching”, but he never clearly defined the term. Pat Hutchings and Lee Shulman (1999) made the following distinctions: 1.  Excellent Teaching : i nvolves teaching well, engaging students, and fostering important forms of student learning. 2.  Scholarly Teaching : in addition to the characterises of excellent teaching, scholarly teaching  entails practices of formative assessment and evidence gathering, is informed not only b
Read more

A matter of conviviality: a note on the "Big Tent" metaphor in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL)

Image
  Big Tent Debate in SoTL Center for Engaged Learning  Elon University, North Carolina, 18 September 2013. The “big tent” metaphor has thus far characterised much of SoTL’s thinking about its inherent diversity. Huber and Hutchings (2005) identify the “teaching commons,” as the process of coming together to encourage discourse within and outside of our disciplines about how we teach and how students learn. These Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching colleagues encourage scholars to make their inquiries not private but communal enterprises that cultivate discipline-specific methodologies in an ongoing pursuit of deepening our understanding of teaching and learning. They urge us to create a “big tent” for SoTL (Huber & Hutchings, 2005, p. 30).  Mary Huber & Pat Hutchings with Tony Ciccone (2011, p. 9) clarified the "big tent" debate in SoTL as based on a distinction made between advocates of constructionism . Constructionist learning is the creation by lea
Read more