Digital Resources for the Humanities and Arts

Digital Resources for the Humanities and Arts
7 - 9 September 2009
Queens University, Belfast

REGISTRATION OPEN

Keynote Speakers:

PROFESSOR STEVE BENFORD (University of Nottingham) Trajectories Through Mixed Reality Performance

DR ANDREW GREEN (National Library of Wales) Big Digitisation: Where Next?

PROFESSOR JANE OHLMEYER (Trinity College, Dublin) and
MARIE WALLACE (IBM) Dealing with Dirty Data: Theory and Practice

The conference will address the following themes:

* the impact of data on scholarship and wider society
* how innovations become mainstream through mutation and imitation
* digitisation of scholarly editions and cultural heritage
* digital representation of time, space and locality
* digital preservation and sustainability
* user engagement and social participation
* the impact of narrative and design in the Arts and Humanities on ICT
and vice versa
* education and the digital humanities and arts
* the theory and practice of creating and documenting digital arts

CONTACT
To contact the conference organisers please go to Contact

HOSTS
This conference is co-hosted by Queen's University Belfast, the Royal Irish Academy, and Swansea University in partnership with the National Library of Wales.

WORKSHOPS
Three pre-conference workshops will take place across 5-6 September 2009. We are offering discounted places to those delegates who also register for the DRHA Conference on or before 31 July 2009. Please note workshops are limited to a maximum of 15 participants so book early to avoid disappointment.

For more details visit Workshops

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Education versus “learnification” what’s at stake?

Will the effects of pandemic pedagogy accelerate learnification?  Gert Biesta ,  Dutch-born education philosopher  who is associated with the reclaiming teaching movement,  highlights that the discourse of “education” has become disconnected from “learning.” This shift began during the 1980s, accelerated as a consequence of the proliferation of educational technology over the past twenty years, and is likely to increase with data-gathering and extended reality becoming ubiquitous within educational systems. Biesta makes the point that language constructs reality and that the language of learning has privileged process , but has excluded questions of purpose and content and relationships within dynamic human interrelationships that should define teaching and learning (Biesta, 2012). The sole concern of learnification becomes the individualistic process of learning, rather than the purpose , context , and relationships that are central to education as both a humanistic and holistic
Read more

The Teaching Portfolio in Principle and in Practice

"Changing the status of the  problem  in teaching from terminal remediation to ongoing investigation is precisely what the movement for a scholarship of teaching is all about." (Bass, 1999: 1).  A: From "scholarly teaching" to "scholarship of teaching (and learning)" Ernest L. Boyer (1990), advocated that the idea of scholarship in higher education needed to be broadened to include teaching as well as the dimensions of discovery, integration (later changed to engagement), and application. Boyer made a strong case for a “scholarship of teaching”, but he never clearly defined the term. Pat Hutchings and Lee Shulman (1999) made the following distinctions: 1.  Excellent Teaching : i nvolves teaching well, engaging students, and fostering important forms of student learning. 2.  Scholarly Teaching : in addition to the characterises of excellent teaching, scholarly teaching  entails practices of formative assessment and evidence gathering, is informed not only b
Read more

A matter of conviviality: a note on the "Big Tent" metaphor in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL)

Image
  Big Tent Debate in SoTL Center for Engaged Learning  Elon University, North Carolina, 18 September 2013. The “big tent” metaphor has thus far characterised much of SoTL’s thinking about its inherent diversity. Huber and Hutchings (2005) identify the “teaching commons,” as the process of coming together to encourage discourse within and outside of our disciplines about how we teach and how students learn. These Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching colleagues encourage scholars to make their inquiries not private but communal enterprises that cultivate discipline-specific methodologies in an ongoing pursuit of deepening our understanding of teaching and learning. They urge us to create a “big tent” for SoTL (Huber & Hutchings, 2005, p. 30).  Mary Huber & Pat Hutchings with Tony Ciccone (2011, p. 9) clarified the "big tent" debate in SoTL as based on a distinction made between advocates of constructionism . Constructionist learning is the creation by lea
Read more