Big Tent Debate in SoTL Center for Engaged Learning Elon University, North Carolina, 18 September 2013. The “big tent” metaphor has thus far characterised much of SoTL’s thinking about its inherent diversity. Huber and Hutchings (2005) identify the “teaching commons,” as the process of coming together to encourage discourse within and outside of our disciplines about how we teach and how students learn. These Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching colleagues encourage scholars to make their inquiries not private but communal enterprises that cultivate discipline-specific methodologies in an ongoing pursuit of deepening our understanding of teaching and learning. They urge us to create a “big tent” for SoTL (Huber & Hutchings, 2005, p. 30). Mary Huber & Pat Hutchings with Tony Ciccone (2011, p. 9) clarified the "big tent" debate in SoTL as based on a distinction made between advocates of constructionism . Constructionist learning is the creation by...
Throughout the pandemic, scholars, administrators, and developers have been asking: which tools and practices from emergency education during the coronavirus pandemic may become part of established practice? Related to this question is how scholars have responded to the present event by turning to past pedagogies to inform current practices. I focus on the tools for conviviality initiated by Ivan Illich in Deschooling Society (1970); defined by Illich in Tools for Conviviality (1973); and refined by Illich in Medical Nemesis (1975). There is renewed interest in Illich as part of contemporary discussions of emancipatory education. I historicise Illich’s tools for conviviality to make the point that remote learning and homeschooling during the pandemic has brought marginal pedagogies into mainstream focus. I divide this post into three parts: first, a brief explanation of Illich’s core idea of tools for conviviality using Deschooling Society...
My recent visits to Cambridge last September and to Oxford in April set me thinking about the role space plays in shaping teaching and learning. Gaston Bachelard , Michel Foucault , Paul Virilio and Alain De Botton have written about the ways buildings create and hold spatial "memory" and this "memory" serves as a cultural imprint. Architectural space as institutional "memory" Buildings are marked by "memories" of their performance and their making. Spaces affect perception. Alain De Botton succinctly expresses this as follows: “political and ethical ideas can be written into window frames and door handles” (De Botton, 2007, p. 93). Paul Virilio used the term "archaeology" to reveal a phenomenon of architectural space. For Michel Foucault, perceptions of space conditioned the discourse of postmodernity. This marked a clear departure from nineteenth century thought where concern lay in representation of time and history (Smethurst, ...
Comments
Post a Comment